Building a scalable digital platform for a construction business
A website strategy, UX and WordPress build designed to strengthen credibility, showcase project capability and support future content growth.
Digital Experience, Accessibility and Content Clarity
Identify the barriers that make your website harder to use - and turn them into a practical remediation plan.
Accessibility issues are often distributed across templates, content, navigation, forms, media and third-party tools. People may be unable to complete important tasks, while the organisation carries avoidable usability, reputational and compliance risk.
Accessibility issues are often distributed across templates, content, navigation, forms, media and third-party tools. Without a structured audit, teams can see isolated symptoms without understanding their severity, recurrence or ownership.
People may be unable to complete important tasks, while the organisation carries avoidable usability, reputational and compliance risk.
A Web Accessibility Audit evaluates representative pages, templates and journeys against the agreed accessibility standard and the realities of the implemented site. It combines automated checks with expert review and documents issues in a form that designers, developers and content owners can act on.
The precise scope depends on the starting point and the decision to be made. The following areas are commonly considered in Web Accessibility Audit.
Plan scope and conformance target around the defined audience, proposition, landing journey, budget guardrails and measurement rules.
Examine the available evidence for automated and manual, then identify the issues, opportunities and decisions that should shape the next step.
Address keyboard and assistive-technology checks in the context of the wider engagement, connecting the work to the available evidence and the intended decision.
Examine the available evidence for content and form, then identify the issues, opportunities and decisions that should shape the next step.
Define prioritised issue register with clear choices, owners, dependencies, review points and an explicit link to the intended outcome.
Plan remediation and retest plan around the defined audience, proposition, landing journey, budget guardrails and measurement rules.
Organisations preparing a redesign or launch; public-facing and regulated organisations; teams responding to known accessibility concerns; and website owners that need a prioritised baseline rather than a generic compliance score.
It is less useful when there is no clear owner, insufficient access to the relevant systems or evidence, or no capacity to act on the findings. Discovery should confirm suitability before a wider programme is agreed.
DSC adapts the detail to the organisation, but Web Accessibility Audit follows a controlled, evidence-led sequence.
Define priority audiences, tasks, content, technology, accessibility needs, ownership and success measures.
Translate evidence into architecture, journeys, content patterns, functional requirements and measurable acceptance criteria.
Implement the agreed front-end, back-end, content and integration work using controlled components and standards.
Review responsive behaviour, accessibility, content, performance, forms, analytics, security and edge cases.
Release through a controlled process, hand over ownership and monitor the experience against agreed measures.
The final scope is agreed around the decision rather than a fixed menu. A typical Web Accessibility Audit engagement may provide:
The proposal should state which items are included, the evidence and access required, who owns each review and what sits outside the agreed scope.
A clearer view of current barriers, affected user journeys, recurring component issues and the order in which remediation should be addressed.
Success should be tested against agreed user tasks, accessibility, content, responsive behaviour, technical acceptance, measurement and maintainability after release.
Relevant client work showing how this service area has been applied in practice.
A website strategy, UX and WordPress build designed to strengthen credibility, showcase project capability and support future content growth.
A joined-up programme spanning research and strategy, search visibility, paid acquisition, analytics and digital experience to strengthen the school's recruitment journey.
A Web Accessibility Audit evaluates representative pages, templates and journeys against the agreed accessibility standard and the realities of the implemented site. It combines automated checks with expert review and documents issues in a form that designers, developers and content owners can act on.
Organisations preparing a redesign or launch; public-facing and regulated organisations; teams responding to known accessibility concerns; and website owners that need a prioritised baseline rather than a generic compliance score.
Audience and service requirements, current content and architecture, design and brand authorities, technical environment, accessibility target, integrations, analytics and content owners.
The exact outputs are agreed in the proposal. Typical deliverables include agreed audit scope and representative sample, issue log with severity, evidence and affected component, prioritised remediation roadmap, review session with design, development and content owners, and retest or validation plan where included.
Success should be tested against agreed user tasks, accessibility, content, responsive behaviour, technical acceptance, measurement and maintainability after release.
No. DSC can improve the quality of diagnosis, planning, implementation and learning, but outcomes also depend on the organisation, market, budget, offer, platform behaviour and the way recommendations are implemented.
Share the current situation, the decision you need to make and any constraints that matter. We will help determine whether Web Accessibility Audit is the right next step and what evidence would be required.